On Hinduism

The Ramayana is, perhaps first and foremost, the tale of a man who strives to constantly live up to his ideals but is forced to, like all of us, live in an unideal world. It is through this lens, then, that we may understand his choice to banish Sita, a choice that resulted from a situation in which there was no good option. 

Rama’s people, mistakenly believing that Sita was “impure”, demanded that she be banished. As King of his people, Rama’s duty was to follow the will of the people as mandated by Hindu scriptures, whatever the will of the people may be (Indian kingship was much more democratic than European kingships, with the ideal Indian king simply serving as an executor of the people’s will rather than someone with absolute power). Thus, as the people demanded that his wife be banished, Rama faced a dilemma: to follow the duty of a husband and stand by his wife, or to follow the duty of a Dharmic king and obey his people. He chose the latter, giving an insight into the Hindu belief that the matters of the nation stand above one’s personal life, and also giving a poignant glimpse into the hardships that leaders face, perhaps even till this day. 

What is important to note, however, is that while he decided to fulfill the duty of a king, he tried his level best to fulfill the duty of a husband as well: though he easily could have, he never remarried, and lived out the rest of his life dedicated to the service of his people. 

Sita herself did not fault Ram Bhagwan. Her tears were for Ram Bhagwan’s pain to have to banish her and not for her own pain. She understood and sympathized with what he had to do. She was an exemplary bhakta of Bhagwan and a faithful wife. Sita passed the Agni Pariksha (fire test) but later prayed to Mother Earth (Bhūmi Devi), her divine mother, to take her back. The earth opened, and Sita was embraced by Bhūmi Devi. She disappeared into the earth, never to return.

This story serves as an example of how good people can be forced into situations where there is no right answer, and to Hindus around the world, provides some guidance for how to address these issues as well.

Other reading material: Bulbul @ New India Abroad, Many Ramayanas, Many Lessons A book by Anand Neelakantan,

Relevant videos:https://youtu.be/qA_Plb_Tspg?t=1596, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_4s1eVLptA&list=PLWsnhdZKqEqyHyRAAO5P-mDnLg9mUlH1u&index=10 , Ami Ganatra on Sita, Dr.. Kumar Vishwas, Manoj Muntashir, Tilak video on Sita,

Contributor: Rutvij Horay

Location of this document (24b): https://www.hinduspeakers.org/ufaqs/why-was-sita-tested-by-rama

When discussing this with non-Hindu Americans, I often draw a parallel to World War II. I ask: “Are you glad the USA defeated Japan?” Almost everyone says yes. Then I ask: “Are you glad we dropped two atom bombs on Japan?” The responses are mixed. History shows we could have won without such a horrendous act, yet the victory itself was seen as necessary.

In the same way, I feel deep sorrow that lives were lost and injuries occurred during the Babri demolition. I wish a better strategy had been pursued. At the same time, I am grateful that archaeological surveys have now confirmed the site’s original identity as a Hindu temple.

Reporters often phrase it as “Hindus ‘believe’ it was a temple.” That overlooks an important fact: unbiased historians and archaeologists have declared it to be an ancient temple.

Can we prove Rama was born precisely at that spot? No—just as we cannot prove that Jesus was born at the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. But can we imagine the world’s Christians allowing Muslims to turn that sacred site into a mosque without resistance?

Contributor: Fred Stells

Location of this post (29e): https://www.hinduspeakers.org/ufaqs/what-are-your-views-on-demolition-of-the-babri-mosque/